Bean, R. J., 1966, A rapid graphical solution for
the aeromagnetic anomaly of the two-dimensional tabular body: Geophysics, 31 (5), 963-970.
Boschetti, F., Dentith, M., List, R., 1997,
Inversion of potential field data by genetic algorithms: Geophys. Prosp., 45 (3), 461-478.
Bhattacharyya, B. K., Leu, L. –K., 1975,
Spectral analysis of gravity and magnetic anomalies due to two-dimensional structures:
Geophysics, 40 (6), 993-1013.
Fedi, M., Quarta, T., De Santis, A., 1997,
Inherent power-law behavior of magnetic field power spectra from a Spector and Grant
ensemble: Geophysics, 62 (4), 1143-1150.
Garcia-Abdeslem, J., Ness, G. E., 1994, Inversion
of the power spectrum from magnetic anomalies: Geophysics, 59 (3), 391-401.
Hansen, R. O., Simmonds, M., 1993,
Multiple-source Werner deconvolution: Geophysics, 58 (12), 1792-1800.
Hartman, R. R., Teskey, D. J., Friedberg, J. L.,
1971, A system for rapid digital aeromagnetic interpretation: Geophysics, 36 (5), 891-918.
Hsu, S. -K., Coppens, D., Shyu, C. -T., Depth to
magnetic source using the generalized analytic signal: Geophysics, 63 (6), 1947-1957.
Keating, P. B., Weighted Euler deconvolution of
gravity data: Geophysics, 63 (5), 1595-1603.
Ku, C. C., Sharp, J. A., 1983, Werner
deconvolution for automated magnetic interpretation and its refinement using
Marquardt’s inverse modeling: Geophysics, 48 (6), 754-774.
Nabighian, M. N., 1984, Toward a
three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert
transforms: Fundamental relations: Geophysical, 49 (6), 780-786
Nabighian, M. N., 1974, Additional comments on
the analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section:
Geophysics, 39 (1), 85-92.
Nabighian, M. N., 1972, The analytic signal of
two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: Its properties and use for
automated anomaly interpretation: Geophysics, 37 (3), 5007-517.
Naudy, H., 1971, Automatic determination of depth
on aeromagnetic profiles: Geophysics, 36 (4), 717-722.
Ostrowski, J. S., Pilkington, M., Teskey, D. J.,
1993, Werner deconvolution for variable altitude aeromagnetic data: Geophysics, 58 (10),
1481-1490.
Peters, L. J., 1949, The direct approach to
magnetic interpretation and its practical application: Geophysics, 14, 290-320.
Pilkington, M., 1997, 3-D magnetic imaging using
conjugate gradients: Geophysics, 62 (4), 1132-1142.
Qin, S., 1994, An analytic signal approach to the
interpretation opf total field magnetic anomalies: Geophys. Prosp., 42 (6), 665-675.
Reid, A. B., Allsop, J. M., Granser, H., Millett,
A. J., Somerton, I. W., 1990, Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using Euler
deconvolution: Geophysics, 55 (1), 80-91.
Roest, W. R., Verhoef, J., Pilkington, M., 1992,
Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal: Geophysics, 57 (1), 116-125.
Roy, L., Agarwal, B. N. P., Shaw, R. K., 2000, A
new concept in Euler deconvolution of isolated gravity anomalies: Geoph. Prosp., 48 (3),
559-575.
Shuey, R. T., 1972, Application of Hilbert
transforms to magnetic profiles: Geophysics, 37 (6), 1043-1045.
Spector, A., Grant, F. S., 1970, Statistical
models for interpreting aeromagnetic data: Geophysics, 35 (2), 293-302.
Stavrev, P. Y., 1997, Euler deconvolution using
differential similarity transformations of gravity or magnetic anomalies: Geophys. Prosp.,
45 (2), 207-246.
Thompson, D. T., 1982, EULDPH: A new technique
for making computer-assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics, 47 (1),
31-37.
Thurston, J. B., Smith, R. S., 1997, Automated
conversion of magnetic data to depth, dip, and susceptibility contrast using the SPI (TM)
method: Geophysics, 62 (3), 807-813.
Werner, S., 1953, Interpretation of magnetic
anomalies at sheet-like bodies: Sveriges Geologista Undersok, Ser. C. C. Arsbok 43, N:o6.
Zhang, J., 2000, An analysis of the accuracy of
magnetic source-body geometry determined from the 3-D analytic signal: Geophysics, 66 (2),
579-581.
